Legal Opinion

People v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 17, 2012PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Mastro, J.E, Florio, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. FoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. CalindaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. MendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. AlleyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API