Legal Opinion

People v. Calinda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2016No. 2015-03879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Margulis, J.), imposed March 26, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]).

Eng, P.J., Leventhal, Cohen, LaSalle and Barros,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. StanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. ReaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. DorseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. MaisonetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API