Bartlett v. Missouri Department of Insurance
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
Rule 94 prescribes the practice, procedure, and pleading for mandamus proceedings in circuit court, including the requirement that a circuit court issue a preliminary writ before an answer and decision on the merits. Here, the circuit court issued summonses rather than a preliminary writ. But the “practice of issuing a summons in lieu of a preliminary writ is not authorized by Rule 94,” and this Court will not exercise its discretion to treat the summonses as a preliminary writ in this case. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 n.1 (Mo. banc 2013) (warning that this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs v. BoresiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Office of the Public Counsel v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- State ex rel. Tivol Plaza, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- State Ex Rel. Ashby Road Partners, LLC v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harold Lampley and Rene Frost v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Alisa WarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- State ex rel. Tivol Plaza, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- Missouri ex rel. Mo. Clean Energy Dist. v. McEvoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Riley v. City Adm'r of LibertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Shaw v. Administrative Hearing CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.