Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Missouri Department of Insurance

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 22, 2017No. SC 96212PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 94 prescribes the practice, procedure, and pleading for mandamus proceedings in circuit court, including the requirement that a circuit court issue a preliminary writ before an answer and decision on the merits. Here, the circuit court issued summonses rather than a preliminary writ. But the “practice of issuing a summons in lieu of a preliminary writ is not authorized by Rule 94,” and this Court will not exercise its discretion to treat the summonses as a preliminary writ in this case. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 n.1 (Mo. banc 2013) (warning that this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. United States Department of Veterans Affairs v. BoresiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Office of the Public Counsel v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Tivol Plaza, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. State Ex Rel. Ashby Road Partners, LLC v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harold Lampley and Rene Frost v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Alisa WarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Tivol Plaza, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Missouri ex rel. Mo. Clean Energy Dist. v. McEvoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Riley v. City Adm'r of LibertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Shaw v. Administrative Hearing CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API