Legal Opinion

Royal Palace Homes, Inc v. Channel 7 of Detroit, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1992No. Docket 126381PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, P.J.

In this defamation action, defendants appeal by leave granted from the circuit court’s denial of their motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8). We remand with instructions to permit plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their complaint and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Plaintiffs, Royal Palace Homes, Inc., and Royal Shannon Homes, Inc., are building contractors engaged in the residential construction business. Defendants, Channel 7 of Detroit, Inc., Scripps Howard Broadcasting Company, and M. J. Enterprises, Inc., are producers or owners of two…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. v. WilnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Thomas M Cooley Law School v. Doe 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Linebaugh v. Sheraton Michigan Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Andrews v. StallingsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Northland Wheels Roller Skating Center, Inc v. Detroit Free Press, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API