Alameda Books, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is the district court’s grant of summary judgment against the City of Los Angeles on the grounds that the City’s Ordinance for the dispersal of adult entertainment businesses violates the First Amendment. We reverse. The district court erred by granting summary judgment on the issue whether the plaintiffs had presented “actual and convincing” evidence “casting doubt” on the City’s rationale for its Ordinance.
I. Facts and Procedural History
The facts of this resilient case are not in dispute. Toward the end of the 1960’s the City of Los…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Fenters v. Yosemite ChevronDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Lopez v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- (PC) Bierman v. Nurse 1District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Bland v. MoffettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Gann v. UgwuezeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.