Legal Opinion
84 Video/newsstand, Inc. v. Thomas Sartini
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2011No. 09-3920UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs 84 Video/Newsstand, Inc. et al. (Plaintiffs) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants Thomas Sartini, et al., (Defendants), law directors and county prosecutors for cities, villages, and counties throughout Ohio, and Defendant-Intervenor State of Ohio, in this action challenging certain regulations of sexually oriented businesses in Ohio as violative of the First Amendment. We AFFIRM.
I
On May 16, 2007, the Ohio General Assembly adopted Substitute Senate Bill 16 (“S.B. 16”), codified at Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2907.40 (West 2010)…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Entertainment Productions, Inc. v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Heller v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- J.L. Spoons, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Cheshire Bridge Holdings, LLC v. City of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Team Worldwide Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.