Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Intel Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 2005No. C020497CV; A120695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, J. pro tempore

Plaintiffs, Mark Schmidt (Schmidt) and his wife, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing their negligence, Oregon Employer Liability Law (ELL), and loss of consortium claims against defendant Intel. They assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment and its granting of Intel’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Schmidt was Intel’s subject worker and, therefore, Intel is protected from liability by the exclusive liability provision of the workers’ compensation law, ORS GSG.OlSllXa). Plaintiffs argue that Schmidt was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Oregon Drywall Systems, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Rubalcaba v. Nagaki Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  2. SAIF Corp. v. Department of Consumer & Business Services Insurance DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Brehm v. CATERPILLAR, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API