Legal Opinion
Moeller v. Colorado Real Estate Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 8, 1988No. 86SC199PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review Cumpsten v. Colorado Beal Estate Commission, 727 P.2d 380 (Colo.App.1986). The issue before us for review is whether a private party who is defrauded by a licensed real estate broker in a scheme to buy and develop subdivision lots is entitled to recovery from the Colorado Real Estate Recovery Fund (Fund). See §§ 12-61-301 to -305, 5 C.R.S. (1973 & 1982 Supp.). Edward C. and Anne Moeller (Moellers), husband and wife, obtained a default judgment against Red Rooster Realty (Red Rooster) and Hi-Valley Builders (Hi-Valley) based on fraud, willful…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Gebhardt v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- People in Interest of MSHSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Manor Vail Condominium Ass'n v. Town of VailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- ACE American Insurance Company v. Dish NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- U.S. Fax Law Center, Inc. v. T2 Technologies, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Interest of SpohrColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- MCI Communications Services, Inc. v. B&F Company Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.