Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Kesten & Cooper
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert D. Hamm, J.
This is a proceeding for an order designating a single arbitrator to act with the same force and effect as if he had been specifically agreed on by the parties.
The petitioner and the respondent in 1952 entered into a partnership agreement which contained the following provision: *761“ 17. The parties agree that if any disagreement shall arise, in respect to the conduct of the partnership business or of its dissolution, or in respect to any other matter, cause or thing, whatsoever, not herein otherwise provided for, the same shall be decided, and determined by an arbitrator; such arbitrator to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Newburger v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of General Elec. Co. (Elec., Etc., Workers)New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re the Arbitration between Eagar Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Dembo v. StasigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stoute v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983