Cox v. Timm
Indiana Supreme Court
From Pulaski Circuit Court; Francis J. Vurpillat, Judge. Remonstrance by Ray Cox and others against the granting of a liquor license to Fred Timm. From a judgment of the circuit court granting the license, the remonstrants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCox, C. J.
A proviso to §4 of the Proctor liquor law stipulates, ‘ ‘ That the number of retail licenses which may be granted in any city or township under this act shall not be more than one for each five hundred inhabitants thereof, *9which number may be further limited by the board of county commissioners of any county to any number not less than one to each one thousand inhabitants of such city or township.” The same section provides that any limitation by the board shall be made at its first session after the act takes effect. Acts 1911 p. 244, §8323g Burns 1914. The board of commissioners of Pulaski…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- TOWN OF HOMECROFT v. MacBethIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- HOUTCHENS v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Wayne Township v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.