Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1992No. 03531PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue we decide, inter alia, is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to impose sentences for robbery and burglary while appellant’s life sentence under Pa.R.Crim.P. 351 et seq. was being appealed. We find the trial court had jurisdiction. However, on an unrelated ground we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

In this case appellant appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed for robbery and burglary. Appellant claims that the sentences are illegal because the trial court lacked jurisdiction. Appellant alternatively claims that the sentences constitute an abuse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. ChessonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. RichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. PolandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. CanfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Com. v. Landis, W., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API