Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1990No. 00051 HBG 89PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant pleaded guilty to charges of theft by deception, criminal conspiracy, forgery, tampering with records or identification, theft by unlawful taking or disposition, and unlawful use of a computer. Appellant later was sentenced to concurrent five-to-ten-year terms of imprisonment for conspiracy and forgery, as well as lesser concurrent terms of incarceration for theft by deception, and unlawful use of a computer.1 The five-to-ten-year sentences imposed for conspiracy and forgery were the maximum terms allowable by law, and the minimum sentence of five years was three and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. ChessonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. ImpellizzeriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. CornishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. CanfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. KephartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API