Legal Opinion

Arble v. Murray

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1948No. Appeal, 131PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an action of trespass for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by negligence of defendants. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants for $7,000. We can find no merit in this appeal of the original defendant. The additional defendant did hot appeal. It was necessary to submit the case to the jury. Even defendant’s own testimony suggests his negligence. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned President Judge of the court below.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKEE BY McKEE v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. McErlean v. McCartanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. City of Toledo v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Henry v. TraboshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API