Wilson v. Tri-City Hospital District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
Introduction
In this case we are called upon to interpret the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Phillips v. Desert Hospital Dist. (1989) 49 Cal.3d 699 [263 Cal.Rptr. 119, 780 P.2d 349] (Phillips). In Phillips the court held that a written notice which alerts a public entity to the existence of a claim for monetary damages and an impending lawsuit but fails to comply substantially with the requirements of the claim presentation statute must be treated by the public entity as a defective “claim” which triggers operation of Government Code sections 910.8, 911 and 911.3. Those…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Phillips v. Desert Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Richer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Foster v. McFaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Alliance Financial v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Schaefer Dixon Associates v. Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Mandjik v. Eden Township Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.