Legal Opinion

Brimhall v. Grow

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1971No. 12103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the State of Utah, declared Utah Savings and Loan Association insolvent and took possession of its business and assets on December 5, 1966. Plaintiff in marshaling the assets initiated this action to have judicially declared void certain conveyances of real property by the defendant corporations and D. Spencer Grow and Ar-ta L. Grow, as individuals, to Steven L. Grow, son of the individual defendants. The corporate conveyances were executed by the defendants Grow or other members of the family as officers of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. MacQueen v. Dollar Savings Bank Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Givan v. LambethUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Ogden State Bank v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Territorial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Nelson v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Segal v. Grooms (In Re Grooms)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1981
  4. Nelson v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API