Legal Opinion
MacQueen v. Dollar Savings Bank Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1938No. 26772PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The sole inquiry relates to the validity of the deposit of the life insurance policy with the bank as collateral to secure the indebtedness of Howard T. Eaton, managing officer and sole stockholder of the corporation, The Eaton Builders Supply Company (now insolvent), which took out the insurance policy on the life of Eaton payable to itself, paid the premiums thereon and is named as beneficiary therein; the specific question is: Is the plaintiff as assignee for the benefit of the creditors of the insolvent corporation entitled to replevin the policy from the defendant bank?
There is no doubt…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Swift v. Smith, Dixon & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Stony Brook Lumber Co. v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Murphy v. Arkansas & L. Land & Improvement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Belfance v. Bushey (In Re Bushey)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Ohio Corrugating Co. v. DPAC, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- Nursing Home Building Corp. v. DeHartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Ohio Corrugating Co. Ex Rel. Official Creditors Committee v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc. (In Re Ohio Corrugating Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Silagy v. Gagnon (In Re Gabor)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.