Legal Opinion

Segal v. Grooms (In Re Grooms)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah

Decided August 24, 1981No. 19-21155PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RALPH R. MABEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case raises burden of proof problems under the Utah Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act. The factual and procedural background is as follows.

On May 31, 1978, debtor gave a note for $21,005 to the Central Bank and Trust Company. This was a renewal of a note which had matured. It was secured by assets owned by a corporation which debtor controlled. On June 7, 1978, debtor conveyed his home, which he owned free and clear of any encumbrance, to his son and daughter-in-law, Roger and Kathryn Grooms. The consideration for this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dunn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Bradbury v. RasmussenUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Zimmerman v. Mozer (In Re Mozer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  4. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. T. D. Smith v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Territorial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API