Legal Opinion
Baldine v. Klee
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1968No. 1754, 1755 and 1756PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCray, J.
These three libel actions are in this court on appeal from judgments of the Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County.
On October 14, 1963, an amendment to Section 2703.03, Revised Code, became effective. The amendment required that the summons state “the nature of the relief sought.”
In these cases, in the body of the summons, the nature of the relief sought was not stated but it was stated on the back thereof. A certified copy of the petition was served on each defendant with the summons in accordance with the rules of court.
Defendants filed motions to quash the service of summons in all three…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- McCoun v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BlahaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Maloney v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Holt v. SatherMontana Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Burroughs Framing Specialists, Inc. v. 505 W. Main St., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- O.B. Corp. v. CordellOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Chaffin v. ShrontzOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.