Legal Opinion
Maloney v. Callahan
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1933No. 24159, 24160 and 24161PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
The general rule is that every action must be brought in the county in which the defendant resides or may be summoned. Section 11277, General Code. This is subject to the qualification that, when an action is rightly brought in any county according to the provisions of Chapter four of Title IY, Division II, of Part Third of the General Code, a summons may be issued to any other county against one or more of the defendants, at the plaintiff’s request. Section 11282, General Code,
Were these actions “rightly brought” in Mahoning county within the meaning of Section 11282, so that summonses might…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abilene Independent Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- State Ex Rel. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Proctor v. Wells Bros. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Green v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1919
- Ross v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hardenbergh v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hartley v. Jerry's Radio & Electric ShopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Mary Grooms v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Baldine v. KleeOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
- Krabill v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.