Legal Opinion

McCoun v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1872PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The order in this and several hundred other actions now before us and depending upon the result of this appeal is not appealable. Only such orders arising upon any interlocutory proceedings, or upon any question of practice, are appealable, as affect a substantial right and do not involve any question of discretion. (Code, § 11, sub. 4.) A departure from the Code in any particular, in the progress of an action, does not necessarily affect a substantial right. A strict and literal compliance with a statutory regulation is not necessarily of the substance of the remedy, or substantial in its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wyman v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. Schermerhorn v. NobleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Bander v. CovillNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Jackson ex dem. Pioneer v. GarnseyNew York Supreme Court · 1824

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Valz v. Sheepshead Bay Bungalow Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . SidorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Lane v. InnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API