Legal Opinion

In Re Boyer's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. Docket No. 144, Calendar No. 39,606PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnedl, J.

After abandonment by defendant of the cross-appeal only two questions remain.

Was plaintiff entitled to go to the jury on the question of the permanency of his ward’s injuries?

Should a new trial have been granted on the ground that the jury’s award of damages was inadequate?

About 3 p. m., on the 22d day of July, 1934, Frank C. Gardner, then aged 15, was driving a Ford auto mobile in an easterly direction on U. S. highway No. 112, about 12 miles west of the village of Clinton. Charles Henry Boyer, a veterinary, was driving a Plymouth automobile in a westerly direction on the same highway,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brininstool v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Norris v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Deffenbaugh v. Inter-State Motor Freight Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
  4. Kellom v. City of EcorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Agee v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API