In Re Boyer's Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnedl, J.
After abandonment by defendant of the cross-appeal only two questions remain.
Was plaintiff entitled to go to the jury on the question of the permanency of his ward’s injuries?
Should a new trial have been granted on the ground that the jury’s award of damages was inadequate?
About 3 p. m., on the 22d day of July, 1934, Frank C. Gardner, then aged 15, was driving a Ford auto mobile in an easterly direction on U. S. highway No. 112, about 12 miles west of the village of Clinton. Charles Henry Boyer, a veterinary, was driving a Plymouth automobile in a westerly direction on the same highway,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brininstool v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Norris v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Deffenbaugh v. Inter-State Motor Freight Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
- Kellom v. City of EcorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Agee v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.