Brininstool v. Michigan United Railways Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; North, J. Case by Yerne S. Brininstool against the Michigan United Railways Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The plaintiff, driving a team of horses in the highway, adjoining the track of the defendant’s *173railway, was thrown, from the wagon and injured. The team was frightened; the wagon and harness broken. He alleges in his declaration:
‘ ‘ The said defendant, by its agents, servants, and employés, again sounded said whistle, without any reason or cause therefor, a large number of times, for the express purpose of frightening said team, and of injuring said plaintiff; that at the time said whistle was sounded as aforfesaid, said car was not approaching any crossing nearer than 1^- miles from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Briggs v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Collins v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wallace C. Clissold and Ingebord Clissold v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
- Motts v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Laskowski v. People's Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.