Legal Opinion

Brininstool v. Michigan United Railways Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1909No. Docket No. 107PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Calhoun; North, J. Case by Yerne S. Brininstool against the Michigan United Railways Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The plaintiff, driving a team of horses in the highway, adjoining the track of the defendant’s *173railway, was thrown, from the wagon and injured. The team was frightened; the wagon and harness broken. He alleges in his declaration:

‘ ‘ The said defendant, by its agents, servants, and employés, again sounded said whistle, without any reason or cause therefor, a large number of times, for the express purpose of frightening said team, and of injuring said plaintiff; that at the time said whistle was sounded as aforfesaid, said car was not approaching any crossing nearer than 1^- miles from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Collins v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wallace C. Clissold and Ingebord Clissold v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
  4. Motts v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Laskowski v. People's Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API