Legal Opinion
Azam v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 2, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1558PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, individuals who are either licensed to operate taxicabs in the District of Columbia or who utilize taxicabs as passengers, bring this action against Ronald Linton, Chairman of the District of Columbia Taxicab Commission, and the District of Columbia, challenging various regulations enacted by the Commission as violating the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”).…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Justin Sanchez v. LadotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Justice v. KoskinenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Justin Sanchez v. LadotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Seth v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018