Legal Opinion

State v. Moe

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1992No. C1-91-2061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge * .

Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the trial court’s downward durational departure in sentencing where at the plea hearing the trial court indicated its intention to depart if respondent Michael J. Moe cooperated in providing information to police on an unrelated criminal matter. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Moe was arrested and charged with theft, possession of stolen property, possession of burglary tools, and resisting arrest. On June 26, 1991, Moe appeared in court to plead guilty to an amended charge of temporary theft or control of a car. Given Moe’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AnyanwuCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. State v. TuttleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. VahabiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API