Hunsaker v. Sturgis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiff recovered judgment for the sum of two thousand two hundred and fifty dollars, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
Hunsaker, Tyler, Wittenmyer and the defendant, all residents of the Town of Martinez, were stockholders in the “ Black Diamond Coal Mining Company,” the first three owning one sixteenth each of the capital stock, and Sturgis holding a still larger interest. The stock belonging to Hunsaker was held by Sturgis in pledge to secure a debt of two thousand five hundred dollars which Hunsaker was owing him. The evidence tended to prove that the' plaintiff, in April, 1863, sold *144his stock to Marziou & Co., of San Francisco, for the sum of four thousand five hundred dollars,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Cisco v. Van LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Curry v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Leggat v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Columbia Telephone Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.