Central Maine Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
The petitions for review in this case challenge orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) that have the effect of reinstituting an earlier charge — the so-called installed capability (“ICAP”) deficiency charge — paid by electric utilities in New England who fail to meet certain reserve capacity requirements. This court stayed implementation of all but a small portion of the charge pending judicial review. The background is complicated but can be summarized as follows.
In New England, as in other regions of the country, electrical power is furnished…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Garrett Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Town of Norwood v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Braintree Electric Light Department v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Electricity Consumers Resource Council v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.