Legal Opinion

Volker v. Fisk

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 6, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Heard on demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, V. C.

The bill alleges that the complainant, being the owner of certain real estate, entered into an oral agreement with the defend*498ant Mrs. Fisk, to sell the same for $5,700 or any greater sum, and- that she should retain for her own use all purchase-money in excess of that sum; that she procured the defendant Fornarotto to purchase the premises for $6,000, and that he paid and secured the consideration money and gave his note for $300 to . her for1 her commissions, and paid the note to her at maturity; that subsequently, and after payment of the note, tire defendant Fornarotto…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
  2. Leadership Real Estate v. HarperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Leschziner v. BaumanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  4. Hammond & Taylor, Inc. v. Duffy Tingue Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  5. List v. Republic Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API