Legal Opinion

Leschziner v. Bauman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 18, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On error to the Essex Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mintuest, J.

The contract between the parties to this litigation reads as follows:

“I herewith agree to pay to Si Leschziner & Company a commission of $1,250 on the day of passing title, or July 15th, for the sale of the Budolph, Stella, Caroline and Crescent apartment-houses to the Home Coupon Exchange Company. H. C. Bauman.”

In directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of the ease the learned trial court said:

“The question reduces itself to a simple matter of construction whether this agreement to pay a commission on the day of passing title or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Volker v. FiskNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  2. Courter v. LydeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  3. Gordano v. LunettaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Prince George's Country Club, Inc. v. Edward R. Carr, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Marschalk v. WeberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Richard v. FalletiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API