Legal Opinion

Soderlin v. Marquette National Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1943No. 33,425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Youngdahl, Justice.

In an action for money had and received, there were findings for defendant. Plaintiff moved in the alternative for amended findings or a new trial and appealed from a denial of the motion.

Since 1914 plaintiff has been engaged in the plumbing and heating business in Minneapolis. During the years 1938 and 1939 he also sold electrical appliances in connection with his business. These appliances were sold on conditional sales contracts and financed through the Electric Home and Farm Authority, an agency of the federal government. The Minneapolis General Electric Company,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burleson v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Seifert v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Lamson v. Towle-Jamieson Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Northwestern Upholstering Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Erickson v. BorchardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hydroflo Corp. v. First Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Denn v. First State Bank of Spring Lake ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Papex International Brokers Ltd., A/K/A Les Courtiers Papex International Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API