Legal Opinion

Hydroflo Corp. v. First Nat. Bank of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1984No. 83-123PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

Hydroflo Corporation, named as payee on a number of checks, brought this action against the First National Bank of Omaha as a collecting or depositary bank, to recover the amounts paid on those checks to a bank customer who had wrongfully endorsed the checks and had the proceeds deposited to his account.

The district court sustained the bank’s demurrer to the third cause of action, money had and received, and directed verdicts in favor of the bank, at the close of plaintiff’s case, upon the first (conversion), second (negligence), and fourth (Consumer Protection Act) causes of action, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. National Bank v. Refrigerated Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Driekosen v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Libbey-Owens Ford Glass Co. v. L & M PAPER CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. P.M.F. Services, Inc. v. GradyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. Delta Chemical and Petroleum, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of ByhaliaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
  4. In re Conagra Foods Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  5. Wrede v. Exchange Bank of GibbonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API