Legal Opinion

Lamson v. Towle-Jamieson Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1932No. 29,072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

When this action was called for trial defendants objected to the introduction of any testimony by plaintiff and moved for judgment on the pleadings. That motion granted, plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The case is but a new, revised, and much simplified edition, under a new title but by the same authors, of Olive v. Taylor, 182 Minn. 327, 234 N. W. 466. The history of the matter is sufficiently stated there to make it necessary, for present purposes, to submit only the briefest summary. Formerly the owner of a valuable farm, plaintiff conveyed it to the Interstate Evangelistic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Atlantic Trust Co. v. DanaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Herring v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Burleson v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Mehlhop v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Guinness Import Co. v. Mark VII Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. Soderlin v. Marquette National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Marking v. MarkingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Parsons v. Town of New CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API