Legal Opinion
Patricia H. v. Berkeley Unified School District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 21, 1993No. C-92-2237 WHOPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORRICK, District Judge.
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance____
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a).
The major question raised by the cross-motions for summary judgment now before the Court 1 is whether the mandate above quoted proscribes the maintenance of a sexually hostile educational environment in any education program or activity receiving federal financial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Rosa H., Individually and as Next Friend of Deborah H. v. San Elizario Independent School District, San Elizario Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Aurelia Davis, as Next Friend of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Aurelia Davis, A/n/f of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education, Charles Dumas and Bill QuerryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Crandell v. New York College of Osteopathic MedicineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.