Legal Opinion
Aurelia Davis, A/n/f of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education, Charles Dumas and Bill Querry
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-9121PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Circuit Judge:
Aurelia Davis, as mother and next friend of LaShonda D., appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims under Title IX and § 1983 against the Monroe County Board of Education (“Board”), Board Superintendent Charles Dumas and elementary school Principal Bill Querry (collectively “defendants”). Davis’ complaint for injunctive relief and compensatory damages alleged that LaShonda was sexually harassed on a continuous basis by a male, fifth-grade classmate, that defendants knew of the harassment yet failed to take any meaningful action to stop it and protect her,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Seamons v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Jane Doe v. Claiborne County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Rosa H., Individually and as Next Friend of Deborah H. v. San Elizario Independent School District, San Elizario Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.