Legal Opinion

Tanner v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2007No. 06-15405PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Kelly Lee Tanner appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Tanner contends that the district court erred in rejecting his claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in his state criminal proceedings, that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary, and that the district court should have granted his request for an evidentiary hearing. The district court issued a certificate of appealability as to all three issues. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Steven Crittenden v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Martin Fong v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API