Legal Opinion

Martin Fong v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2014No. 11-17051PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TIMLIN; Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER.

OPINION

TIMLIN, District Judge:

Arizona state prisoner Martín Raul Fong Soto (“Petitioner” or “Fong”)1 appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his jury convictions of murder, robbery and attempt, and aggravated robbery and attempt arising from a triple homicide. A separate jury convicted Petitioner’s codefendants, Christopher McCrimmon (“McCrimmon”) and Andre Minnitt (“Minnitt”), of similar charges in later prosecutions brought by the same prosecutor in Petitioner’s case. However,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Colin Dickey v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Charles Clements v. Raymond MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. (HC) Armstrong v. AsuncionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Castillo v. HattonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Daniel Frazer v. McDowellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API