Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cutter v. Kamman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1898No. 18,522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Prom the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellant to compel, by writ of mandamus, appellee Obertate, a road supervisor, to repair a part of a certain highway in his road district, and appellee Kamman, trustee of said township, to sue said Obertate for the statutory penalty for his failure to keep said highway in repair. An alternative writ was issued, and appellees each moved to quash the same, and also filed a demurrer for want of facts, to the petition for the alternative writ. The motions to quash the alternative writ and the demurrers to the petition were sustained by the court.

The errors assigned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bay City v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Hamilton v. State ex rel. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jeana M. Horner v. Terry R. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Martin v. MarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Olson v. HonettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API