Legal Opinion
Plaza 61 v. North River Insurance
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1978No. Civ. A. 75-1116PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HERMAN, District Judge.
This is a diversity action brought by the insured against the insurer on a builder’s “all risk” policy. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. There is no dispute as to the following facts:
On October 19,1972, Cressona Plaza, Inc., Plaintiff in this action, entered into a contract with Majo Corporation (hereafter Majo) 1 for construction of a shopping center in Pottsville, Pennsylvania, which was to be known as “Plaza 61”.
In connection with the construction of Plaza 61, Plaintiff secured from Defendant a builder’s “all risk” insurance policy, providing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Penn-Air, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Welded Tube Company of America v. Phoenix Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Young-Peterson Construction, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. The Potomac Insurance Company of the District of Columbia, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
3Cited by10 opinions
- Intermetal Mexicana, S.A. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Griggs Rd., L.P. v. Selective Way Ins. Co. of Am.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Easy Corner, Inc. v. State National InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Gatti v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pacific Marine Center, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.