Legal Opinion
Enercon Industries Corporation, and Ahlbrandt Systems, Inc. v. Pillar Corporation, Pillar Technologies, Inc., and Pillar Technologies, L.P.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 31, 1997No. 96-1132PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
ARCHER, Chief Judge.
Enercon Industries Corp. and Ahlbrandt Systems, Inc. (collectively Enercon) appeal the “Decision and Order” (order) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin dismissing their claim for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,446,110 (the ’110 patent) against Pillar Corp., Pillar Technologies, Inc., and Pillar Technologies, L.P. (collectively Pillar), Enercon Indus. v. Pillar Corp., No. 86-C-740 (E.D. Wis. June 14, 1995). Outstanding counterclaims remain pending before the district court. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Elizabeth Nye Woodard, Miles Cogley Nye, Jr., and the Kendall Company v. Sage Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Spraytex, Inc. v. Djs&t and Homax CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- State Contracting & Engineering Corp. v. FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- State Contracting Engineering v. FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.