Legal Opinion

State v. Ali

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 2008No. A07-0428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of first-degree assault, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial because (1) the district court abused its discretion by denying his request for an instruction to the jury on a lesser-included offense, (2) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct, and (3) he was prosecuted by an assistant county attorney whose license to practice law was on restricted status. We affirm.

FACTS

In the early morning of January 7, 2007, appellant Abdulkani Ali got into an argument with a clerk at a Minneapolis convenience store and began using…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Hamilton v. RoehrichDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API