Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Roehrich
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 20, 2009No. Civ. 08-2500 (PAM/RLE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson dated March 17, 2009. In the R & R, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in its entirety and dismiss this action with prejudice. Petitioner filed timely objections to the R & R.
According to statute, the Court must conduct a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s opinion to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited143 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BLACK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- James Louis Crawford v. Jeremy WelchDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2026
- Mark S. Hendrickson v. Tracy Beltz, Warden; and Keith Ellison, Minn. Atty. Gen.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- Scales v. State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022