Legal Opinion
CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Light Efficient Design
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 3, 2019No. 1:17-cv-07359Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CAO LIGHTING, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 17 C 7359 v. Judge Harry D. Leinenweber LIGHT EFFICIENT DESIGN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc. (“CAO”) alleges that Defendant TADD, LLC, doing business as Light Efficient Design (“TADD”), is infringing its patent, United States Patent No. 6,465,961 (“the ‘961 Patent”). Both parties have submitted opening claim construction briefs (Dkt. Nos. 26, 27) and supplemental claim construction briefs (Dkt. Nos. 67, 68). The parties dispute the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.