Legal Opinion

State v. Vance

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 2008No. 27,048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, Judge.

{1} Defendant was convicted of trafficking methamphetamine by manufacture, distribution of a controlled substance, possession of drug precursors, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He raises three issues on appeal, one of which is an issue of first impression in New Mexico: whether under the circumstances of this case, medicines such as pseudoephedrine cold tablets are excluded from the statutory definition of a “drug precursor” under the Drug Precursor Act (DPA), NMSA 1978, §§ 30-31B-1 to -18 (1989, as amended through 2004). We conclude that Section 30-31B-2(L)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. SaizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ComitzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. ComitzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Spengler v. SpenglerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API