Legal Opinion

Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2016No. S218734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRUGER, J.

—Under California law, a real estate broker may act as a “dual agent” for both the seller and the buyer in a real property transaction, provided both parties consent to the arrangement after full disclosure. (Civ. Code, §§ 2079.14, 2079.16.) To that end, the law requires brokers to disclose whether they are acting as dual agents and to inform the parties that a broker acting as a dual agent owes fiduciary duties to both buyer and seller. {Id., § 2079.16.) In carrying out its duties, the broker may act either directly or through one or more “associate licensees”—typically…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Salahutdin v. Valley of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scher v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Lazar v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Taigod 3 v. Mandarin Realty 1 Corp. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API