Legal Opinion
Haynes & Boone v. Bowser Bouldin, Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided September 17, 1993No. 04-91-00555-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPELLANT’S AND APPELLEES’ MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
REEVES, Chief Justice.
Our original opinion which was delivered and filed on July 14, 1993, is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefore.
This appeal questions a legal malpractice judgment. Bowser Bouldin/Bouldin Development Company (appellees) successfully sued its former law firm Haynes & Boone (appellant) under the theories of common law negligence and the DTPA. Bowser Bouldin/Boul-din Development Company (Bouldin) conditionally elected the DTPA remedy and recovered both actual and punitive damages. Bouldin won by establishing that…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haynes & Boone v. Bowser Bouldin, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- O'Farrill Avila v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- D.R. v. J.A.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Leonard & Harral Packing Co. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
- Danny Earl Tennison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.