Rushing v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUNELL, Justice.
Appellant was found guilty of murder by a jury. After considering his plea of true to the enhancement paragraph of the indictment, the jury assessed punishment at sixty years in prison and a $10,000.00 fine. He now brings three points of error, alleging: (1) the evidence was insufficient to corroborate the testimony of his accomplice, Billy Joe Gibbs; (2) the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s objection to the State’s argument at the punishment phase of trial that appellant had used drugs shortly before the time of the murder, and that the jury could consider…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kunkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Lomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Klueppel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Pritchett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
- Casarez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Alex Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.