Legal Opinion

United States v. Gooch

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 7, 2014No. Criminal No. 2004-0128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge

Larry Gooch has filed a pro se Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his criminal convictions and sentence. The United States opposes the motion. The Court has reviewed the motion carefully and concludes that it must be denied. Mr. Gooch’s claims are without merit.

I. FACTS

Larry Gooch was a defendant in the multi-defendant prosecution of a drug dealing enterprise — the M Street Crew— in'Washington, D.C. An investigation of the M Street Crew by the Safe Streets Task Force, a joint effort by the D.C. Metropolitan…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry Gooch, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. McCoy v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. United States v. BenbowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API