Legal Opinion
State v. Silsby
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 2008No. 2007-1254PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} Two questions are presented for consideration on this appeal. The first is whether a delayed appeal authorized pursuant to App.R. 5(A) is the same as a timely filed direct appeal. The second is whether our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470, applies to a delayed appeal filed subsequent to that case. We hold that Foster applies only to delayed appeals that were pending at the time that we released it.
{¶ 2} William Silsby appeals from a decision of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals affirming his sentence that followed a plea of guilty to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Bates v. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Nesser v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Applegarth v. Warden North Central Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.