Legal Opinion

Wicker v. Holland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1998No. COA97-264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 15(c) provides:

A claim asserted in an amended pleading is deemed to have been interposed at the time the claim in the original pleading was interposed, unless the original pleading does not give notice of the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences, to be proved pursuant to the amended pleading.

In this case, plaintiff Ruth P. Wicker argues that Rule 15 permits her to amend her pleading to designate third-party defendant Boles Paving, Inc. (“Boles”) as a defendant to her original complaint so as to allow the relation back…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Summerfield.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Crossman v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Rogerson v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Waters v. BieseckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Liss v. Seamark FoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Piland v. Hertford County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Barnes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Treadway v. DiezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API