Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Foothill Industrial Bank

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1984No. 83-80PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Chief Justice.

In an action against appellees, appellants sought the following relief: (1) return of all principal and loan finance charges (totaling $31,512.28) paid by appellants to appellee Foothill Industrial Bank to retire a loan; (2) refund of excess amount paid on prepayment of said loan ($1,449.68) plus a penalty of not more than the loan finance charge, by virtue of appellee Foothill Industrial Bank’s, failure to make such a refund within a reasonable time after demand; (3) statutory penalty damages ($1,000.00) for various violations of federal and state disclosure laws; and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Brittain v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garner v. HickmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Goggins v. HarwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. Air Freight, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API