Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
These cross appeals involve two automobile accidents where the same person was victimized by two rear-end collisions in about eight months. Victim Lloyd K. Hashimoto (Hashimoto) is appealing his jury verdict awarded damages as inadequate based on several contended trial errors. The colliding vehicle’s driver, Penton Jerry Dixon (Dixon), and his employer, Marathon Pipe Line Company (Marathon), are appealing the award of deposition costs to Hashimoto and contended inadequate award to them of other litigative costs. Hashimoto comprehensively phrases the issues for which he…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State National Bank of El Paso v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Wallach v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Bigley v. CravenWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.